IMPERIAL FORUM, Alleria -- In a stunning turn of events at the Trial of the
Empire v. Nighthawk, the Advocate representing Former Imperial Regent Alexander Nighthawk, Professor Rachael Illiander, cited Article 15 of the Articles of Imperium, and claimed that any actions that the former regent undertook while in office were "not subject to responsibility." Article 21 of the Articles of Imperium maintains that a State of Regency ensures that the Imperial Regent shall enjoy all powers of the office of Emperor, including the inviolability clause mentioned in Article 15. Advocate Illiander re-iterated her statement when she concluded that the Imperial Regent, like the Emperor, should "know no limit on power".
Justicar Juliara, presiding over the landmark case against former Imperial Regent Alexander Nighthawk, who was deposed by an uprising of mages shortly after he attacked them with a magical spell, quickly called the court back to order and seemed to consider the Advocate's words carefully.
The legal community is sharply divided on what Advocate Illiander's findings may do to the trial. "It is remarkable that it took the defense this long to raise Article 15, in reference to Article 21," mentioned Professor Lynara von Fowler of the University of Alleria's College of Law. "Nonetheless, it is excellent timing and holds the best grounds upon which to liberate Lord Nighthawk from what would be almost certain doom at the hands of a very punitive legal system."
"Article 21 does not apply," argued Professor Dafydd Beqr, who predicted that the prosecution would make a similar argument, "for if only the Emperor has the power to appoint an Imperial Regent, then an Imperial Regent cannot surely appoint another Imperial Regent, can he? It does not seem an organic proposition per the Articles of Imperium."
In a case that may spiral into the hands of the Tribunal of Justice for final review, it bears mentioning that the fate facing Alexander Nighthawk is uncertain. Analysts have indicated that should he be declared guilty of all charges, he could face execution for the attempted murder of the mages. Should he only be found guilty for certain political charges, such as disruption of the political process, he may face only a lengthy imprisonment followed by hard labor. The gamble played by Professor Illiander will, nonetheless, be reviewed by scholars and legal analysts for decades to come, and may very well be the defining characteristic of this trial.
More information shall come as it is made available.